Astrometry Nadi/KP Astrology/Horary Software: Significators and Question Timing
14 October 2026
Astrometry Nadi/KP Astrology/Horary Software is a specialist workspace combining stellar significators, KP sub-lords, Nadi layers and horary tools. This guide explains what to prepare, how to move through the existing software and how to interpret the report without overstating what the method can establish.
What to prepare
The software asks for birth details for natal work, or the question-time and supported horary settings for a Prashna enquiry. Enter the details as recorded rather than adjusting them to obtain a preferred result. When a tool uses time and place, check the time zone and coordinates before calculating.
How to use Astrometry Nadi/KP Astrology/Horary Software
Step 1. Start with a correctly timed natal or horary chart.
Step 2. Trace planet, nakshatra lord and sub-lord links; do not jump straight to a verdict.
Step 3. Compare three-layer significators and relevant house groups.
Step 4. Use Dasha-Bhukti-Antara and ruling-planet evidence to examine timing after the promise is established.
What the report contains
The resulting report includes nirayana cusps, significators, sub-lord chains, life-event analysis, Dasha evidence and Horary Prashna views. These sections are designed to be read together: a summary is useful for orientation, while the tables and evidence explain how the local rules reached it.
Promise first, timing second
A significator chain describes the house groups represented by a planet and its stellar links. Dasha periods are a later timing layer, not a substitute for reviewing promise. Keep natal and Horary Prashna work distinct: they use different starting moments. If you compare two sessions, preserve the ayanamsa, location, offset and relevant horary settings so a changed result has an identifiable cause.
Frequently asked question
Should I combine all horary systems?
Use the method selected by the question workflow first. Comparing methods can be study, but mixing their house rules or timing conventions does not create stronger evidence.
A disciplined review checklist
Confirm the person, question, date, time, place and settings shown in the report.
Distinguish measured or calculated data from traditional interpretation.
Keep warnings, confidence labels and “not assessed” results instead of filling gaps.
Save or download only after checking that the on-screen details are correct.
Compare later reports only when the same settings and source details are used.
Responsible use
KP and Nadi are traditional interpretive methods. A software result depends on the selected settings and source birth or question time.
UC Berkeley’s Understanding Science explains why astrology does not meet scientific evidence standards. The traditional readings in this guide should be distinguished from astronomical calculation. See Understanding Science: Astrology.
Start with the matching software
Open Astrometry Nadi/KP Astrology/Horary Software to use the workflow described above. For more context, read the related Astrometry guide or browse all Astrometry software.